MHEWC-III: Public private engagement for early warnings

 

Session objectives

 

A growing number of developing country governments are interested in using Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to provide public infrastructure assets and services. The sectors responsible for the various elements of the Early Warning System Value Chain are now considering this approach.  

The main objective of the session is to discuss public-private engagement around the 4 components of the People Centered EWS: Disaster risk knowledge; Detection, monitoring, analysis and forecasting of the hazards and possible consequences; Warning dissemination and communication; Preparedness and response capabilities.   

Public and private sector representatives will share how their activities are helping improve operational efficiency, quality and sustainability in the provision of public good services, including the challenges faced.   

Mutual trust is the foundation of all partnerships and is a topic that is important to unpack.  The importance of “doing something together” even on a small pilot scale to concretize the discussion and build trust cannot be over-emphasized.  Panelists will share examples of concrete collaborations, and share lessons learned on how these helped or did not help to build trust. 

The panel will also explore synergies between each component and recommend to the extent possible, where systematic knowledge exchange should take place to ensure parties benefit from the collaboration. 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
Off
Contact
On behalf of the co-chairs of IN-MHEWS (UNOOSA/ UN-SPIDER and WMO), mhew3@wmo.int
Display on agenda
No
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Nusantara Ballroom
BICC First Floor
Conference event type
Learn more

The First Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-I): Saving Lives, Reducing Losses was organized by IN-MHEWS and took place on the 22nd and 23rd of May 2017 in Cancún, Mexico, as a pre-event to the Fifth Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in 2017 (GP2017). The Second Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-II) took place on the 13th and 14th of May 2019 as a pre-event to the Sixth Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (GP2019) at the Headquarters of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in Geneva. 

Building on the progress and achievements of the first two conferences, the Third Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-III) is planned to take place 21-22 May 2022 at Bali Nusa Dua Convention Center, Bali, Indonesia. MHEWC-III provides a unique opportunity to review key accomplishments, share skills, experience, and expertise within an active MHEWS network. Attendees will exchange and explore how the community can scale efforts in MHEWS implementation to better deliver on the aspirations of MHEWS the Sendai Framework, Paris Agreement, and Sustainable Development Goals.  Moreover, practical training opportunities to support and enhance understanding and utilization of key advances in science will be organized. Training is envisioned to include modules on artificial intelligence, new data sources/information, communication standards / technologies, monitoring and evaluation to track the effectiveness of MHEWS.

Event bucket
Preparatory Days
Organizing Team members
  • OTT Hydromet

MHEWC-III Consultation process supporting the development of the Words into Action Guide on Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems

This learning event will serve as a consultation process supporting the development of the Words into Action Guide on Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems.

Session objective

The purpose of the event is to inform participants of the MHEWC-III on the status and main contents of the WiA guide on MHEWS and encourage initial feedback including suggestions to improve the content and as such its applicability. Session participants will discuss the content of selected sections of the consultative version of the WiA guide to reinforce the contents and its ‘how to’ approach.

 

Session methodology

  1. The content of the MHEWS WiA guide will be presented.
  2. Participants will be requested to share generic feedback.
  3. Working in smaller groups will facilitate receiving comments and suggestion for four selected sections of the WiA guide.

In addition, participants will be able to provide any additional feedback through a brief online questionnaire. The online questionnaire will contain the same questions that are asked during the meeting.

Participants are encouraged to register if they are interested in participating in the virtual or in-person discussions. This will facilitate defining the breakout groups. Note that after the presentation participants will be divided into groups (in-person as well as virtual) to share initial feedback and focus on specific aspects of the WiA guide.

 

The Consultative Draft can be found here

 

 

Background and Context

 

In 2015, Member States adopted the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 to reduce the human and economic loss caused by disasters and avoid the creation of new risks. To help implement this Sendai Framework, the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) has launched the Words into Action (WiA) Guides as a series of guidelines, based on global expertise, communities of practice, and networks of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) practitioners. The guidelines provide practical and specific advice on implementing a people-centered approach to DRR in line with the Sendai Framework.

Contributing to the WiA series, UNDRR, United Nations Platform for Space-based Information for Disaster Management and Emergency Response (UN-SPIDER) from the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) and World Meteorological Organization (WMO) are leading the elaboration of a new WiA guide that will provide practical guidance to the implementation of the Sendai Target G with special focus on Multi-hazard Early Warning Systems (MHEWS). The envisioned WiA guide will provide advice for governments, stakeholders, and partners on how to institutionalize, operate, monitor, and strengthen people-centred inclusive approaches for multi hazard early warning systems.

In addition to the organizations above, a Reference Group (RG)[1] was formed to guide the process, make recommendations, and provide expert advice. This included for example the selection of good practices and contributions to different sections of the WiA Guide.

To ensure that all relevant aspects are included in the WiA guide and to integrate the users’ point of view, the document proposes steps to ensure a participative consultation and validation.

[1] RG members: CREWS secretariat, FAO, IFRC, ITU, JRC/EC, GFDRR/WB, Practical Action, REAP secretariat, UNDRR, UNDP, UNESCAP, UNESCO, UNOOSA/UN-SPIDER, UNICEF, UNITAR, WFP, WHO, WMO and others.  

 

 

Groups
 

Group 1: Early Warning – Early Action 

  • What practical recommendations could you suggest reinforcing the contents of the section 3.1 of the guide that trigger the implementation of early actions after an alert was issued? 

Group 2: Impact-based Forecasting (IBF) 

  • What else must be considered for a successful shift to IBF? Please indicate if proposed steps in section 3.2.3 are clear enough or further information should be included. 

Group 3: Governability to foster institutionalization of MHEWS 

  • Please suggest advocacy activities / campaigns / strategies to foster the institutionalization of MHEWS. Please complement section 2.2 of the Guide. 

Group 4: Financing mechanisms 

  • Which strategies can be implemented to ensure proper financing mechanisms to sustain the implementation of MHEWS? Please complement section 2.3 of the Guide.  

Question for all groups 

  • What is your overall feedback to the initial draft of the guide? Do you have any suggestions to improve the content of the guide considering the practical nature (how-to) of the guide?

 

 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
Off
Contact
On behalf of the co-chairs of IN-MHEWS (UNOOSA/ UN-SPIDER and WMO), mhew3@wmo.int
Display on agenda
No
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Nusantara Ballroom
BICC First Floor
Conference event type
Learn more

The First Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-I): Saving Lives, Reducing Losses was organized by IN-MHEWS and took place on the 22nd and 23rd of May 2017 in Cancún, Mexico, as a pre-event to the Fifth Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in 2017 (GP2017). The Second Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-II) took place on the 13th and 14th of May 2019 as a pre-event to the Sixth Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (GP2019) at the Headquarters of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in Geneva. 

Building on the progress and achievements of the first two conferences, the Third Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-III) is planned to take place 21-22 May 2022 at Bali Nusa Dua Convention Center, Bali, Indonesia. MHEWC-III provides a unique opportunity to review key accomplishments, share skills, experience, and expertise within an active MHEWS network. Attendees will exchange and explore how the community can scale efforts in MHEWS implementation to better deliver on the aspirations of MHEWS the Sendai Framework, Paris Agreement, and Sustainable Development Goals.  Moreover, practical training opportunities to support and enhance understanding and utilization of key advances in science will be organized. Training is envisioned to include modules on artificial intelligence, new data sources/information, communication standards / technologies, monitoring and evaluation to track the effectiveness of MHEWS.

Event bucket
Preparatory Days
Organizing Team members
  • UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)
  • United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA)
  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

MHEWC-III Learning Event: Are our early warning systems effective?

Session objectives

 

The Session objectives will explores: 

  1. The gaps, boundaries, constraints and limitations of MHEWS in saving lives, reducing livelihood impact and loss and damages for both extreme (sudden-onset and new creeping hazards) linked to Climate Change and or complex cascading or compounding geophysical /biological hazards? 

  1. emerging challenges of Early Warning Systems in context of both Climate Change and Urbanization’ and how to adapt EW messages to the needs of people and communities in an integrated and sustainable way 

  1. Review and solicit input on a new methodology that draws on the MHEWS checklist here New strategies and opportunities for the international community to support LDCs and SIDS measure the effectiveness of MHEWS and provide support in how we redesign/enhance MHEWS to better connect the systems to timely and appropriate Early Actions and decision making across the range of timescales? 

 

 

Guiding Questions

 

  1. What are the successes and proven benefits of effective MHEWS? 
  2. What are the gaps, limitations of MHEWS in saving lives, reducing livelihood impact and loss and damages for both extreme (sudden-onset and new creeping hazards) linked to Climate Change and or complex cascading or geophysical compounding geophysical /biological hazards?  
  3. What do you think are the emerging challenges of Early Warning Systems in context of both Climate Change and Urbanization/development trends?  
  4. How to adapt MHEWS and messages to the needs of people and communities in an integrated and sustainable way? 
  5. What are the new strategies and opportunities for the international community to measure the effectiveness of MHEWS and support how we redesign/enhance MHEWS to better connect the systems to timely and appropriate Early Actions and decision making across the range of timescales?  
  6. How can countries and communities at risk benefit from advances in science, technology, governance and community-based engagement behind early warning systems 

 

 

Expected outcomes

 

  1. Showcase how MHEWS save lives, reduce impact on livelihood, and reduce disruption to social services and infrastructure systems. 

  1. Highlight why and how early warning systems are not effective, and improve understanding of the gaps, boundaries, limitations and emerging challenges of existing MHEWS in the light of new creeping and sudden-onset hazards linked to Climate Change and complex geophysical/biological hazards. 

  1. Identification of new strategies and opportunities for the international community to further advance and enhance MHEWS for the benefit of society, in particular towards reducing not only loss of lives, but also impacts on livelihood and infrastructures etc 

  1. Introduction to/feedback on a new methodology and tool for measuring the effectiveness of MHEWS. 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
Off
Contact
On behalf of the co-chairs of IN-MHEWS (UNOOSA/ UN-SPIDER and WMO), mhew3@wmo.int
Format
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Nusantara Ballroom
BICC First Floor
Conference event type
Learn more

Investments in preparedness and response capacities have been significant by governments disaster management entities, development and humanitarian partners, including through increasingly uptake of anticipatory approaches linked with adaptive social protection mechanisms. Benefits of these efforts can be accounted for the recent findings of the WMO Atlas for Mortality and Economic Loss (1970-2019), which found a significant reduction in mortality related to hydrometeorological events.  However, the report also notes that there has been a significant increase in economic losses due to weather, climate and water extremes. Therefore, there is an opportunity for the international community to reconsider MHEWS design to better connect the systems to decision making across the range of timescales.

Moreover, as noted in the recommendations of the 2020 State of Climate Services – Risk Information and Early Warning Systems, more investments are needed to fill the capacity gaps, especially in LDCs (such as Africa) and SIDs for effective EWS. Furthermore, there are emerging resources to support countries in better assessing and monitoring the effectiveness of their MHEWS to ensure systems are delivering desired benefits.  Practical training and feedback on the CREWS ‘Measuring Effectiveness of Early Warning System through Sendai Framework Monitoring’ set of custom indicators were developed which provide a measure on the quality/effectiveness of MHEWS.

From stock take to scale on Target G, MHEWC-III will develop recommendations for GP2022 to enable transformation to a systemic approach to inclusive early warning and early action for all hazards to reduce impacts and losses

Event bucket
Preparatory Days
Organizing Team members
UNESCO-IOC, WMO, UNDRR, JRC, REAP, ANTICIPATION HUB

The Third Multi-Hazard Early Conference (MHEWC-III) Opening Session

The kick-off the Third Multi-Hazard Early Warning Conference (MHEWC-III), part of the Preparatory Days of the Global Platform 2022 (GP2022). 

This year's theme is: From Stock Take to Scaling Actions on Target G: Accelerating the Knowledge and Practice of Early Warning Systems for Risk Informed Resilience.

As we approach the mid-point of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, MHEWC-III provides a unique opportunity to review key accomplishments, share skills, experience, and expertise within an active network of early warning practitioners.

The MHEWC-I: Saving Lives, Reducing Losses took place 22-23 May, 2017 in Cancún, Mexico, as a pre-event to the Fifth Session of the GPDRR (GP2017). The MHEWC-II took place in Geneva, Switzerland 13-14 May, 2019 as a pre-event to the Sixth Session of the GPDRR (GP2019). The MHEWC-III builds on the progress and achievements of the first two conferences.

 

 

Agenda
 

  • Opening remarks
  • IN-MHEWS Partners Introductory Video
  • Keynote Speech
  • Interactive Icebreaker

 

 

Background and Context

 

The Sendai Framework was adopted by 187 Member States at the Forth United (UN) World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in Sendai, Japan, on March 18, 2015 “to achieve the substantial reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods and health and in the economic, physical, social, cultural and environmental assets of persons, businesses, communities and countries over the next 15 years”. Seven years into the implementation of the Framework, the Disaster Risk Reduction community has an excellent opportunity to take stock of where we are, what we have accomplished, what we have learned, and to jointly explore how we can collectively transform our engagement to accelerate progress in achieving the Framework’s ambitions.  
The mid-point of Sendai Framework implementation marks a time of increased global urgency. Disasters strike at an unprecedented rate, with the most recent decade experiencing an over three-fold increase in the frequency of disaster occurrence, compared to the 1980s. Moreover, disasters are also becoming more costly, setting back the global economy by an average of USD 170 billion every year.  Reducing mortality, the number of people injured, displaced, and left without a livelihood has never been more challenging given the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic.  
The climate emergency further threatens to impede progress, with the latest IPCC report heralded as a ‘code red for humanity’. Leading scientists across the globe brought together irrefutable evidence that human-induced climate change is already affecting weather and climate extremes. Projections for the coming decades indicate climate changes will increase in all regions. In the best of all scenarios, we must adapt to more extreme weather, water, and climate events.
Considerable progress has been made by national meteorological, and hydrological services (NMHSs), geosciences (geophysics), regional organizations, civil protection agencies, the international community, private sector entities and other stakeholders towards increasing availability of and access to multi -hazard early warning systems (MHEWS), in contribution to Target Gi. However, the risk landscape is changing rapidly driven by climate change and unwise development pathways, and a systemic approach for inclusive early warning and early action for all hazards is becoming urgently necessary.
Investments in preparedness and response capacities have been significant by governments disaster management entities, development and humanitarian partners, including through increasingly uptake of anticipatory approaches linked with adaptive social protection mechanisms. Benefits of these efforts can be accounted for the recent findings of the WMO Atlas for Mortality and Economic Loss (1970-2019), which found a significant reduction in mortality related to hydrometeorological events.  However, the report also notes that there has been a significant increase in economic losses due to weather, climate and water extremes. Therefore, there is an opportunity for the international community to reconsider MHEWS design to better connect the systems to decision making across the range of timescales.
Moreover, as noted in the recommendations of the 2020 State of Climate Services – Risk Information and Early Warning Systems, more investments are needed to fill the capacity gaps, especially in LDCs (such as Africa) and SIDs for effective EWS. Furthermore, there are emerging resources to support countries in better assessing and monitoring the effectiveness of their MHEWS to ensure systems are delivering desired benefits.  Practical training and feedback on the CREWS ‘Measuring Effectiveness of Early Warning System through Sendai Framework Monitoring’ set of custom indicators were developed which provide a measure on the quality/effectiveness of MHEWS.  
From stock take to scale on Target G, MHEWC-III will develop recommendations for GP2022 to enable transformation to a systemic approach to inclusive early warning and early action for all hazards to reduce impacts and losses. 

 

 

Expected Outcomes

 

  • Outcome statement to feed into GP2022 thematic session on early warnings and early action that puts forward recommendations to enable transformation for multi hazard EWS enabling risk-informed early action to reduce impacts and losses 
  • Roadmap/Agenda with strategic priorities, governance arrangements and joint work program for IN-MHEWS updated and voluntary commitments by partners confirmed
  • Contribution to a stock take on progress in the implementation of Sendai Framework target G
  • Methodologies and frameworks for assessing effectiveness of EWS/ Target G custom indicators disseminated 
  • Contribute to a validated Words into Action guide on Multi-hazard Early Warning Systems

 

 

Guiding Themes

 

  • Enablers of transformative change
  • Multi-sector governance
  • Gender sensitive early warning systems
  • Inclusive, people centered risk-informed systems
  • Risk knowledge and impact-based forecasting
  • Anticipatory action
  • Risk communication and warning dissemination
  • Monitoring, evaluation and learning
  • Science, technology and innovation
  • Public-private partnerships
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
Off
Contact
On behalf of the co-chairs of IN-MHEWS (UNOOSA/ UN-SPIDER and WMO), mhew3@wmo.int
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Parent - Conference
Conference event type
Learn more

 

     

    Event bucket
    Preparatory Days
    Organizing Team members

    IN-MHEWS Partners

     

    • Anticipation Hub
    • Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO)
    • Climate Risk and Early Warning Systems (CREWS) initiative
    • European Commission Joint Research Centre (EU-JRC)
    • International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)
    • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
    • International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
    • Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC)
    • OTT Hydromet
    • Risk-informed Early Action Partnership (REAP)
    • Tonkin + Taylor
    • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
    • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)
    • The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO IOC)
    • United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA)
    • UN Women
    • World Health Organization (WHO)
    • World Food Programme (WFP)
    • World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
    • Water Youth Network 

     

     

    Financial Support

     

    MHEWC-III is grateful to the financial support provided by the CREWS initiative and its Contributing Members, including Australia, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.