Term color class
white-on-light-blue

Implementing integration – reflections and lessons from the Pacific, for the future

The Pacific has made significant progress advancing an integrated agenda on DRR & CCA at many levels – from the regional level with the Framework for Resilient Development in the Pacific (FRDP), the national level through integrated policies and implementation mechanisms to the community level. 

This engaging panel session will draw upon the legacy of learnings from the region and importantly focus on what the future may look like across various levels. The session also seeks to provide insights to other regions that can learn from the progress in the Pacific to advance integration in their regions. In doing so, we will also draw on lessons from East Africa and how they built upon the Pacific progress to advance integration in their region. We want to profile what works in practice to empower others, drawing upon a strong base of lessons and evidence. 

This online side event will: 

  • Discuss the integration of DRR and CCA as well as the intersection between integrated programs and sustainable development goals. 
  • Highlight lessons from approaches in the Pacific have demonstrated the importance of meaningful participation from vulnerable groups in planning and action at all levels. 
  • Reflect challenges and opportunities towards financing mechanisms that can support integrated approaches across the DRR and climate financing spectrum 

Session objectives

Discrete objectives of the session are to:  

  1. Profile the progress of the Pacific region in DRR/CCA integration and discuss the importance of a sustained effort by developing countries with the support of partner organizations 
  2. Interrogate common challenges across different levels of integration 
  3. Facilitate learning across levels with a focus on leadership, governance, inclusion and financing 
  4. Generate interest in other regions outside of the Pacific in advancing integration.

Registration

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Cedric Hoebreck, [email protected], Jess Lees, [email protected]
Format
Accessibility
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Mengwi 6, 7, 8
BNDCC 2-Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Speakers

  • Jess Lees -Executive, humanitarian advisory Group (HAG)
  • Mosese Sikivou - Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat
  • Sevuloni Rokomatu -FRC / representing Pacific Youth Network
  • Dr Guleid Artan, Director of the IGAD Climate Prediction and Application Center (ICPAC).
  • Mafua Maka, Director National Emergency Management Office(NEMO)-Tonga
Learn more

The case for integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation to minimize loss and damage, reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience continues to grow. This is against a backdrop of increasing frequency and severity of disasters worldwide and the recognition that, at the community level, the distinction between DRR and CCA is artificial. Linkages between the two policy fields, coming belatedly to communities’ holistic understandings of what is driving their own exposure to risk and how to manage it, have driven policy makers and practitioners to consider how to more closely align approaches to produce better outcomes for crisis affected populations.

Various challenges are preventing or hampering the integration of DRR and CCA but there are also opportunities to strengthen integrated approaches at all levels in ways can improve outcomes for at risk-populations. This side event unpacks some key reflections from the Pacific at different levels, as well as bringing in intra-regional perspectives to understand similarities and differences across regional boundaries.  

Session guiding questions

  1. What are some of the key learnings from the journey towards an integrated framework in the Pacific? 
  2. What does integration look like at different levels; from communities, sub-national to national and regional: is there alignment? 
  3. What have other regions learned from the Pacific journey? What can the Pacific learn from other regions? 
  4. What are some of the main priority areas for future progress? What does successful integration mean in different contexts? 
Event bucket
Informal Programme
Organizing Team members
  • Humanitarian Advisory Group (HAG) 
  • The Pacific Island Forum Secretariat (PIFS) 
  • The Pacific Community 
  • World Vision Australia 
  • Australian Humanitarian Partnership 

Anticipating and acting early - putting communities and creativity at the heart of our learning and exchange

This in-person side event will: 

  • Build a shared understanding of anticipatory action, why it is an important part of Disaster Risk Reduction and how it can capture synergies with Multi-hazard Early Warning Systems development. 
  • Share practitioners’ experiences implementing anticipatory action for a range of hazards (e.g. floods, droughts and volcanic ashfall) across different regions of the world (Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Africa), while creatively engaging participants in an interactive learning exercise.  
  • Demonstrate the need to continuously learn from, engage with, and empower communities and local actors in decision-making processes around the co-design, implementation and evaluation of anticipatory action activities, as part of a comprehensive risk management approach. 
  • Highlight how the Anticipation Hub can help to facilitate knowledge exchange, learning and advocacy around anticipatory action, and capture synergies across longer-term disaster risk reduction and development activities.  

Objectives

The session objectives are to: 

  1. Highlight first-hand stories of the benefits of anticipatory action in saving lives, reducing impacts on livelihoods and strengthening local capacity.  
  2. Enhance understanding of the three components of anticipatory action (triggers, early actions and financing) and how it relates to early warning and Disaster Risk Reduction through an interactive learning exercise with different regional case studies and hazards.    
  3. Facilitate creative dialogue between community representatives, humanitarian actors, governments, and scientific partners to jointly identify how to ensure anticipatory action approaches are co-developed with local actors, empower them and meet their needs. 
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Lydia Cumiskey- Anticipation Hub [email protected] Kara Siahaan, Anticipation Hub [email protected]
Format
Accessibility
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Singaraja Hall 1
BNDCC 1-1st Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Speakers

  • Ms. Rafi Akter, Bangladesh Red Crescent volunteer Bogura Unit-Flood Prone area, Bangladesh 
  • Ms. Sebongile Hlubi, Forecast-based Financing project manager,  Lesotho Red Cross Society
  • Mr. Jorge Arteaga López, manager,  Ecuador Red Cross 
  • Mr. Lawrence Anthony Dimailig, Assistant Director for Disaster Monitoring & Analysis, AHA Centre
  • Ms. Katarina Khoutova, Programme Policy Officer, World Food Programme Nepal 
  • Ms. Ana Dizon, FOREWARN Coordinator Philippines, Start Network
  • Mr. Ahmed Amdihun, PhD, Programme Coordinator, Disaster Risk Management,  IGAD Climate Predictions and Applications Centre (ICPAC)
  • Mr. Bipul Neupane, Director of Disaster Management, Nepal Red Cross Society 
  • Ms. Shanna McClain, Disasters Program Manager, NASA and co-chair Anticipation Hub Earth Observation Working Group
  • Mr. Farai Shonhai, Disaster Risk Management & Climate Change Adaptation Technical Lead, Plan Zimbabwe 
  • Ms. Lisa Robinson, Head of Advisory & Policy,  BBC Media Action
  • Mr. Mathias Amling, Senior Desk Officer, German Federal Foreign Office

Facilitators

  • Kara Devonna Siahaan, Head of the Anticipation Hub 
  • Raymond Zingg,  Regional Forecast-based Financing Coordinator for Asia-Pacific/ Anticipation Hub 
  • Catherine Jones,  Anticipatory Action Lead for Asia & the Pacific, FAO
Learn more

Where do we stand  

Many of the world’s disasters are predictable, and the science used to forecast them is increasingly reliable, enabling actors to put in place the actions and financing required to act before a disaster hits. Early actions include, for instance, providing populations at risk with cash, sanitation and hygiene kits and shelter toolkits ahead of the predicted shock. Triggers are the risk-informed forecast-based thresholds for a particular hazard that will release the pre-agreed financing and set the actions underway.
Anticipatory action approaches are now being implemented in over 60 countries by the Red Cross Red Crescent (RCRC) Network, Start Network, the WFP, FAO, OCHA and others. There is growing evidence, investment and political commitment for scaling up and mainstreaming into national Disaster Risk Management systems. Anticipatory action can address disaster risk and climate change, bridging humanitarian and development agendas. It supports the achievement of the Sendai Framework Target G to substantially increase the availability of and access to multi‑hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to the people by 2030. 
Anticipatory action aims to be locally led and empower local actors, but there is a growing need to further engage communities and local actors to build stronger collaboration between humanitarian actors, governments, scientific partners and others to ensure we are meeting their needs and continuously learning.
The mission of the Anticipation Hub is to facilitate knowledge exchange, learning, guidance and advocacy for practitioners, scientists and policymakers that supports them to jointly work with at-risk communities to collectively achieve anticipatory action. To do so, it brings together 90+ partners across the RCRC Movement, universities, research institutes, (i)NGOs, UN agencies, governments, donors, and network initiatives.

Session guiding questions

  1. What are the practical benefits of anticipatory action as experienced by at-risk communities? 
  2. What are the different components of anticipatory action and how do they connect with Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Systems?  
  3. Who needs to collaborate to ensure that anticipatory action initiatives are engaging with, and meeting the needs of communities?   
  4. What is the Anticipation Hub and how can it help to facilitate knowledge exchange, learning, guidance and advocacy to meet end-user needs? 
Event bucket
Informal Programme
Organizing Team members

This session is organized by the Anticipation Hub, a joint initiative of the German Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, with 90+ partners. 

​Co-organising partners include: 

  • AHA Centre 
  • Australian Red Cross 
  • BBC Media Action 
  • Christian Blind Mission 
  • Climate Risk Early Warning System (CREWS) Initiative 
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 
  • German Federal Foreign Office  
  • Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team 
  • Indonesian Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) 
  • Indonesian Red Cross (PMI) 
  • Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Climate Predictions and Applications Centre  
  • NASA  
  • National Meteorological Service Argentina (SMN) 
  • 510 Netherlands Red Cross  
  • OCHA  
  • Plan International  
  • Risk-informed early action partnership (REAP)  
  • Start Network  
  • UK Met Office 
  • World Food Programme 
  • World Meteorological Organisation  

Stakeholder Forum: Private Sector Alliance for Disaster Resilient Societies (ARISE) constituency session

Economic growth and community well-being are directly impacted by disasters. Impacts often include long-term socio-cultural and psychological challenges. Risk reduction and prevention is a clear strategy to reduce negative impacts and encourage a flourishing global society. As key members of communities and drivers of growth, private sector companies have an important role to play in reducing disaster risk.

Private sector companies, both large and small, recognize the growing importance of disaster risk reduction (on macroeconomic stability, value chains, etc.). Nevertheless, the private sector is not alone in this task. As the Sendai Framework established, the “commitment, goodwill, knowledge, experience and resources” from all stakeholders including academia, media, and other sectors in civil society at the local, national, regional and global levels are needed.

This session gathers ARISE members to exchange views, experiences and knowledge, and broaden their impact based on an all-of-society approach.

Session objectives

  1. To demonstrate how the private sector and ARISE contribute to DRR
  2. To discuss how to enhance collective engagement in DRR
  3. To approve a statement from ARISE for the GP2022 to be submitted in text

Connection details

 

Please click the link below to join the webinar:

  • Passcode: 769165
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Erick Gonzales Rocha [email protected]
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Jakarta Room
BICC First Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator: 

  • Ms. Marilou Erni, Executive Director of the National Resilience Council (NRC)

Introduction (10 min.)

  • Ms. Mami Mizutori, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction (SRSG), ARISE Co-Chair
  • Mr. Hans-Peter Teufers, The UPS Foundation, ARISE Co-Chair

Segment 1 (20 min.): Resilient communities, Build Back Better, and investments into infrastructure

  • Mr. Raymond Rufino, ARISE-Philippines Board Member and CEO of the NEO
  • Mr. Roberto Herrera, Consorcio Energetico Punta Cana Macao (CEPM), ENERGAS
  • Mr. Ahmed Riad Ali, Board Member of UNDRR Private Sector Alliance for Resilient Societies
  • Mr. Roderick Scott, Flood Mitigation Industry Association

Segment 2 (20 min.): Insurance and investment actions for resilience under a COVID-19 context

  • Mr. Hiroo Shimada, Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.; ARISE Japan
  • Mr. Michael Rellosa, Philippine Insurers and Reinsurers Association (PIRA)
  • Mr. Eduardo Robles Chávez, AXA Seguros SA de CV (AXA Mexico)
  • Mr. Hasan Aftab, Risk Exchange (DIFC) Limited

Segment 3 (20 min.): What is new in SMEs and resilience strategies?

  • Mr. Bhagat Khanna, CEO ARISE India
  • Ms. Judy Wambugu, ARISE East Africa
  • Mr. Masato Takamatsu, ARISE Japan Lead; President, Tourism Resilience Japan
  • Mr. Patrick Hardy, ARISE US Board for SMEs

Conclusion (15 min.)

  • Ms. Lizra Fabien, Network of Chambes of Commerce (CARICHAM)
  • Ms. Paola Albrito, Chief of Branch, Intergovernmental processes, interagency cooperation and partnerships, UNDRR
  • Mr. Hans-Peter Teufers, The UPS Foundation, ARISE Co-Chair
Learn more

This session gathers ARISE members to exchange views, experiences and knowledge based on an all-of-society approach.

Where do we stand

Private sector companies, both large and small, recognize the growing importance of disaster risk reduction (on macroeconomic stability, value chains, etc.). Nevertheless, the private sector is not alone in this task. As the Sendai Framework established, the “commitment, goodwill, knowledge, experience and resources” from all stakeholders including academia, media, and other sectors in civil society at the local, national, regional and global levels are needed.

Session guiding questions

  1. How does the private sector and ARISE contribute to DRR?
  2. How to enhance collective engagement in DRR?
Event bucket
Preparatory Days

Stakeholder Forum: Global Youth Platform for DRR and Climate Action 2022

This Children and Youth constituency session grants you(th) the opportunity to deliberate on the call of action for DRR financing and resilience that requires a new approach in the wake of Covid - 19 pandemic. There is a need to redefine the role of youths in key areas including disaster risk governance and climate action to ensure there is constructive participation and contribution from the youth. The culmination of the session will be the declaration of the Global Children & Youth Statement on DRR and Climate Action.

Session objectives

  1. Deliberate on the children and youth perspective on DRR financing.
  2. Identify children and youth demands on DRR and climate action
  3. Consolidate the children youth recommendations into the global children and youth statement on DRR and climate action
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Anish Shrestha [email protected] Terry Otieno [email protected]
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Primary floor language
Event bucket
Preparatory Days

Lessons Learned in Building Resilience - Over the Past 3 Years

During the last years the world has faced an increasing number of disasters with far-reaching social, economic and structural disruption. 

On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation, announced the covid-19 pandemic. Due to climate change and environmental degradation we are facing a rapid increase in hazard severity and frequency.

The negative consequences of these disasters are devastating, but we can learn from them.  When people work together, they thrive together. Our lives are entirely interdependent and disasters - from COVID to climate induced disasters - perhaps more than any other events, demonstrate this reality.

This session will address and bring light to lessons learned from the last three years, and how this can inform future strategies and work in the field of disaster risk reduction.

Session Objectives 

  1. Share good practices and lessons learned in building disaster resilience, and that in an ever changing world.
  2. Enhance the understanding about the evolution of the UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism (UNDRR-SEM) and its recent work in implementing the Sendai Framework.
  3. Bring attention to the Sendai Framework Voluntary Commitments, and its citizens led data collection in monitoring the Sendai Framework implementation, and generation of accountability mechanism of realising global policy.

Online Attendance

This session will be live-streamed online. Note that it is live-streamlining and no active online participation. You can access the live streaming through this link: 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Terry Otieno, MGCY, [email protected] Moa Herrgård, [email protected]
Accessibility
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Exhibition Gallery
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderators

  • Tanjir Hossain, Global Resilience Advisor, Action Aid International

  • Terry Otieno, Global Focal Point, Sendai Children and Youth Stakeholder Group

Speakers

  • Rebecca Murphy, Policy Lead, Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction (GNDR)
  • Fernando Britto, CEO, AI Systems Research (AISR)

  • Andreas Hapsoro, Strategic Alliance Director, Habitat for Humanity Indonesia
  • Nirankar Saxena, Global ARISE Board Member and Deputy Secretary General, FICCI
  • Yuki Matsuoka, Head of The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Office in Japan
  • Rahma Hanifa, Secretary-General, U-INSPIRE Alliance
Learn more

Expected Outcomes

  • Enhanced knowledge and understanding about SEM and its work in contributing to an all of society approach in building disaster resilience.
  • Enhanced knowledge on lessons learned in implementing the Sendai Framework, from a stakeholder perspective.
Event bucket
Preparatory Days

Plans and Opportunities for the future of SEM

The UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism gathers a wide range of stakeholders across the society. They are all unified under the mission of contributing to the implementation of the Sendai Framework, building a sustainable resilient society for all, where disaster risk does not threaten the wellbeing of people and the planet.
Since its establishment, SEM has continuously grown, both in the size and scope of its members, as well as the impact of its work.
This session will increase awareness of SEM and the work the SEM is undertaking. Within the context of the SEM’s new Action Plan, this session will showcase how the SEM continues to have an influencing role and a crucial contributor to key DRR global development fora and processes, bringing the voices of civil society to DRR mechanisms, and catalyse collective action among different stakeholders for risk-informed development.

Objectives

  • Enhance awareness about the UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism, and its structure.
  • Share knowledge about the plans of SEM for year 2022-23, and invite stakeholders, the United System and member states to partner on implementation of these actions.
  • Generate a motivation and excitement to support the implementation of the collective SEM Action Plan 2022-23.

Online Attendance

This session will be live-streamed online. Note that it is live-streamlining and no active online participation. You can access the live streaming through this link: 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Rebecca Murphy, [email protected] Jekulin Lipi, [email protected] Moa Herrgard, [email protected]
Accessibility
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Exhibition Gallery
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator

  • Jyothi Bylappa Maralenahalli, Programme Management Officer, The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

Speakers

  • Rebecca Murphy, Policy Lead, The Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction & SEM Focal Point
  • Jekulin Lipi, Young Scientist, Sendai Children & Youth Stakeholder Group & SEM Focal Point
  • Ramona Miranda, Member of the Steering Committee, Duryog Nivaran (South Asian network on Disaster Risk Reduction)
  • Bikash Chandra Manna, Emergency Response Manager, HelpAge International
  • Sotha Sok, Sotha Sok, Family Farmer & Manager of Cambodian Farmer Federation Association of Agricultural Producers (CFAP)
Learn more

Session guiding questions

  •  Do you have any suggestions of additions or adaptations of the SEM Action Plan 2022-23?
  • What do you think the key priorities are in terms of SEM’s Action Plan2022-23 activities?
  • Do you have a good understanding of what the SEM is?
  • What initiatives can be undertaken to increase SEM’s actions and impact as well as visibility and awareness?
Event bucket
Preparatory Days

WRC5 Technical Session: Responding to Recovery Challenges in the Urban Environment

Watch this session on-demand 

 

 

Cities can present unique challenges for disaster recovery. Rapid urbanization has led to unplanned growth, overcrowding, poor housing conditions, poor connectivity, and vulnerable locations. Cities have borne the brunt of the COVID-19 pandemic and revealed the extent of vulnerability in urban areas. Past urban disasters have also shown that addressing the exposure and vulnerability of infrastructure systems, services and the built environment continue to be critical recovery issues in urban environments. 

The session will provide insights into the recovery challenges in an urban environment pre and post disaster including from COVID-19. It will show innovative solutions to prevent cities from being locked in unsustainable development pathways, creating new risks and further being exposed to future risks.  It will also discuss approaches and strategies in long-term recovery that foster resilience, environmental sustainability and socio-economic well-being of populations in urban areas.  

 

Session objectives

 

  • Assess to what extent preparedness for recovery and building back better are implemented in the urban setting;  
  • Demonstrate emerging partnership models among local government, the private sector, civil society, academia, scientific and research institutions to strengthen disaster and climate risk reduction actions in cities;  
  • Recognize the adjustments required in urban planning and local governance especially in recovery given the systemic nature of risk, and experiences (including cascading and indirect impacts) of the COVID-19 pandemic; and
  • Define priority actions to harness the transformative potential of the pandemic recovery and achieve multiple Sustainable Development Goals
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Yuki Matsuoka [email protected], Paul Rosenberg [email protected]
Session type
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Hibiscus & Frangipani
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator

  • Mr. Steven Goldfinch, Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Asian Development Bank (ADB)

Panelists

  • Ms. Kazuko Kori, Mayor, Sendai City, Japan
  • Mr. Patta Tope, Professor and former Head of Central Sulawesi Province Development Planning Agency, Indonesia
  • Ms. Ares Gabás Masip, Head, Urban Resilience Department, Barcelona City Council
  • Ms. Elizabeth Riley, Executive Director, Caribbean Disaster and Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA)
  • Mr. Arne Janssen, Urban Environment Specialist, Cities Alliance
  • Ms. Saini Yang, Professor, Beijing Normal University, China
Learn more

Where do we stand

Many urban areas are becoming hotspots of disasters due to population growth, increasing and unplanned urbanization, environmental challenges including climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution, and other anthropogenic pressures. Since asset concentration and resource utilization are higher in cities, the disruption of critical infrastructure and essential services after a disaster can cripple the functioning of society and derail prospects for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicates that the key global climate change-related risks are concentrated in urban areas. Climate change is expected to exacerbate urban risks due to exposure to hazards, socio-economic vulnerabilities, and poor governance, among others. However, cities have the unique ability to respond to disasters, climate changes and environmental stresses at a local, more tangible level with dynamism, scale, stronger linkages and partnerships, and a greater sense of urgency among citizens and local authorities. From this perspective, the co-benefits of climate mitigation and adaptation actions are largest in cities, including increasing preparedness for recovery.

Emergency response and the international humanitarian community are not prepared to deal with urban emergencies. Urban areas need a holistic approach to resilient recovery and reconstruction. Sectoral responses are not enough in a system of systems setting as are cities.  

The critical role of population size, density and urban form has been highlighted in the COVID-19 recovery. Recognizing the city as a system of systems, cities are also now rethinking how to better address interdependencies, cascading, compounding and systemic risks, urban-rural connectivity, and transdisciplinary and multi-scale governance, among others, in an integrated manner. The biggest opportunity for urban areas from the pandemic is to build back better with the planned fiscal stimulus as the seeds of transformation toward resilient, green, more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable recovery. 

Session guiding questions

  • To what extent are cities building back better in recovery from disasters? What are the main setbacks and opportunities?
  • How has systems thinking been effectively applied to recovery in urban settings? 
  • How many of the recovery decisions are data and evidence driven? What's the role of quality information in recovery decision making?
  • How can cities adapt to the changing risk environment and recover better from COVID-19 and future disasters?
  • What are some recent and emerging innovations at the local level that can be scaled up in other contexts?
  • How are cities leveraging urban planning and policy to build back better, more sustainable and resilient communities?

 

Event bucket
Preparatory Days

WRC5 Technical Session: Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning

Watch this session on-demand 

 

 

 

Pre-disaster recovery planning (PDRP) and recovery preparedness measures offer solutions that can mitigate challenges toward building back better. The benefits of PDRP for building resilience and improving recovery outcomes are potentially substantial. However, relatively few countries or communities have plans or preparedness measures in place for recovery. PDRP facilitates long-term recovery with a holistic approach, considering the range of potential recovery decisions, actions, and financing needs that will be needed in the event of a disaster. It is consistent with other plans promoting coherence and avoiding planning conflicts in recovery. It links with recovery frameworks, it fosters broad-based participation, and it is often flexible and scalable to meet uncertain needs.

This session aims to demystify PDRP and offer practical options for uptake. Speakers will provide insights and lessons to support leaders and practitioners with PDRP. Speakers will share PDRP success factors and how they have overcome barriers to implementation.   

 

Session objectives

 

 

  • Demonstrate effective models for implementing pre-disaster recovery planning at national and local levels;
  • Share practical experiences and lessons from practitioners, including success factors, barriers, evidence of effectiveness;  
  • Explore the scope of pre-disaster recovery measures and their feasibility to support building back better;  
  • Develop recommendations for a core set of pre-disaster recovery measures. 

 

Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Yuki Matsuoka [email protected], Paul Rosenberg [email protected]
Session type
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Hibiscus & Frangipani
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator 

  • Mr. David McLachlan-Karr, Regional Director Asia-Pacific, United Nations Development Coordination Office (UNDCO)

Speakers

  • H.E. Mr. Inia Seruiratu, Minister for Rural and Maritime Development and Disaster Management, Government of the Republic of Fiji
  • Ms. Cynthia Spishak, Associate Administrator, Office of Policy and Program Analysis, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Government of the United States of America
  • Mr. Takeo Murakami, Director, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
  • Mr. Renato Solidum Jr., Undersecretary, Department of Science and Technology, Government of the Philippines
  • Ms. Lesley Jeanne Y. Cordero, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, World Bank
  • Mr. Jeremias Cabral, Recovery Project Coordinator Recovery 1 and II , National Service for Civil Protection and Fire Brigades (SNPCB), Government of the Republic of Cabo Verde

Discussant

  • Mr.Raul Salazar, UNDRR Chief, Regional Office for the Americas and the Caribbean 
Learn more

Where do we stand

Pre-disaster recovery planning offers solutions that can mitigate challenges toward better, faster, and more equitable recovery outcomes. PDRP can help affected communities to build back stronger. Integration of disaster risk reduction measures and resilient designs into recovery is facilitated by, among other things careful planning, standards-setting, public-private partnerships and pre-arranged agreements. It depends on pre-event baseline data and protocols for timely and accurate post-event data collection to inform decision making. In the absence of preparedness, build back better measures can be cut short and quality may be compromised for the urgency of recovery.  

Pre-disaster recovery planning can help affected communities to build back faster. Pre-disaster recovery plans identify recovery stakeholders, their roles and responsibilities, and set up mechanisms for interagency multi-sectoral coordination. They can identify necessary recovery capacities and training needs. They can establish recovery governance measures, institutions and relationships, policies, and triggers that can snap into action when an event occurs. Pre-disaster recovery plans can also identify funding sources and arrange for available funds when needs arise. These types of measures expedite recovery and reduce losses from delays. 

Preparedness measures can help to build back more inclusively and equitably. The PDRP process gives an opportunity to ensure inclusive planning. It gives time to engage and understand communities, vulnerabilities and needs, and a vision for how communities should recover in ways that are consistent with their values. It allows communities to prepare for disruption and for recovery, and for their governments to establish mechanisms to meet their needs in recovery. 

Session guiding questions

  • What progress has been made in recovery preparedness and planning?
  • What are the major obstacles and enabling conditions for implementing and scaling up PDRP? How could community leaders and practitioners be supported with pre-disaster recovery planning?
  • What ex ante recovery measures have been shown to be effective in achieving better recovery outcomes?
  • What innovative approaches are emerging to improve recovery readiness?
  • How can communities and other stakeholders be meaningfully engaged to ensure inclusive planning?

 

Event bucket
Preparatory Days

WRC5 Technical Session: Addressing Critical Infrastructure Recovery

Watch this session on-demand 

 

 

Evidence shows that infrastructure systems are increasingly affected by natural and man-made hazards, and the impacts of climate change. The COVID-19 pandemic has particularly shown the breadth of the consequences of systematically underinvesting in resilience. As recovery packages are readied and implemented, recovery efforts must build resilience and sustainability into infrastructure systems and networks. Recovery strategies can strengthen resilience of key sectors which provide the first line of defence against disasters and the negative impacts of climate change.

However, today’s reality is that disaster recovery too often is unplanned, and underfinanced. Preparedness to build back better remains limited and is usually addressed only as a post-disaster consideration. Given the growing frequency and intensity of disasters, more needs to be done to allocate necessary resources and develop capacity for recovery actions that build resilience and reduce risk across sectors.

 

Session objectives


  • Improved understanding of the role and importance of resilient infrastructure for recovery
  • Strengthening policy instruments to integrate and finance resilient infrastructure.
  • Identifying ways for improved data collection as a basis for evidence-based decision-making and financing of infrastructure recovery
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Helen Ng [email protected]; Erick Gonzales Rocha [email protected]
Session type
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Mangupura Hall
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator

  • Mr. Abhilash Panda, Deputy Chief for Intergovernmental processes, Partnerships Branch and the Head for Infrastructure Resilience, the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)

Panelists

  • Mr. Ranjith Dissanayke, Secretary of Infrastructure, Sri Lanka    
  • Mr. Igor Linkov, Senior Scientific Technical Manager, USACE and Adjunct Professor, University of Florida
  • Ms. Liz Varga, University College London 
  • Mr. Shaun Tarbuck, International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation (ICMIF) 
  • Mr. Ajay Makhija, Team Leader, Infrastructure Resilience, Planning & Sector Partnerships, National Emergency Management Agency, Government of New Zealand
  • Mr. Bijay Kumar, Executive Director, Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction (GNDR)
Learn more

Where do we stand

Evidence shows that existing infrastructure systems are increasingly being affected by natural and man-made hazards, and from the impacts of climate change. According to reports, infrastructure disruptions impose costs between $391 billion and $647 billion a year in low and middle-income countries. Investing in disaster risk reduction is thus a precondition for developing sustainably in a changing climate. 

However, today’s reality is that disaster recovery too often is unplanned, and underfinanced. Preparedness to build back better remains limited and is usually addressed only as a post-disaster consideration. Given the growing frequency and intensity of disasters driven by climate change, more needs to be done to allocate necessary resources and develop capacity for recovery actions that build resilience and reduces risk across sectors. 

Improved data collection on loss and damage to infrastructure and related services through the Sendai Framework Target D and the Damage, Loss and Needs Assessment mechanisms could support planning, decision-making and investments. That said, a recent analysis by UNDRR and UNDP of 57 PDNA processes under the DaLA methodology, conducted worldwide over the last decade, has shown that service disruptions are estimated on a lower ratio when compared to physical damages, thus missing the opportunity to gain comprehensive understanding of mid- and long-term impacts of disasters on infrastructure systems and the communities that depend on them.

 

Session guiding questions

  • How can recovery strategies be used to strengthen resilience of key infrastructure sectors?
  • How can we ensure that recovery of infrastructure is planned in such a way so as to ensure resilience against future disasters?
  • How can data collection and reporting on infrastructure losses and damages, and service disruptions, at the local, national and regional levels be improved?
  • What are some options for financing resilience in infrastructure recovery? How do we integrate resilience in the current COVID-19 recovery and stimulus packages?
Event bucket
Preparatory Days

WRC5 Technical Session: Exploring Anticipatory Financing to Address Recovery Needs

Watch this session on-demand 

 

 

Anticipatory financing is a mechanism that allows the release of pre-planned funds in the event of imminent disaster or a shock event, which significantly speeds up response and recovery efforts, running ahead of traditional financial aid provision and economic recovery, which require a lot more time and coordination (Weingärtner & Wilkinson, 2019). That said, anticipatory financing should not be understood as a substitute for investment and action to reduce vulnerability and ensure long-term recovery, but should instead be seen as an integral component of disaster risk management, recovery, adaptation and resilience (ODI, 2020). 

To be effective, FdF and anticipatory financing require planning, dedicated funding, establishing systems and distributing roles to stakeholders. Options could be diverse and should be applicable to the local context. This requires improved understanding of the benefits of anticipatory financing, the mechanisms behind it, how it can be integrated into existing policy and practice, and how can different stakeholders contribute and engage in this process. 

 

Session objectives


  • Discuss the role of anticipatory financing for recovery
  • Identify gaps and opportunities for the establishment and adoption of anticipatory and forecast-based financing mechanisms for improved and more resilient recovery
  • Provide examples and share practices from the implementation of anticipatory financing approaches >
  • Identify stakeholders’ roles and engagement
Conference content type
Conference session
Onsite Accessibility
On
Contact
Helen Ng [email protected]; Erick Gonzales Rocha [email protected]
Session type
Display on agenda
Yes
Time zone
Asia/Makassar
Participation
Interpretation (Language)
Primary floor language
Room/Location
Mangupura Hall
BICC Ground Floor
Conference event type
Speakers

Moderator 

  • Mr. Abhilash Panda, Deputy Chief for Intergovernmental processes, Partnerships Branch and the Head for Infrastructure Resilience, the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)

Speakers

  • Mr. Ronald Jackson, Head of the Disaster Risk Reduction, Recovery for Building Resilience, UNDP, and Chair of the International Recovery Platform Steering Committee
  • Mr. Matthias Amling, Senior Desk Officer Humanitarian Assistance, Auswärtiges Amt – Federal Foreign Office, Government of the Federal Republic of Germany
  • Ms. Cristel Pratt, Assistant Secretary-General, Environment and Climate Action, Organization of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS) 
  • Ms. Aisha Jamshed, Director for Welthungerhilfe Pakistan, Coordinator for Start Network's Disaster Risk Financing (DRF) for Pakistan
  • Ms. Quynh Tran, Humanitarian Affairs Officer, Policy Branch, UNOCHA
  • Ms. Kara Siahaan, Head of the Anticipation Hub
Learn more

Where do we stand

Disasters and negative climate change impacts are quite often predictable. Using data and tools for risk assessments and forecasts is now possible, rendering early action not only possible but morally imperative (Weingärtner & Wilkinson, 2019; British Red Cross, 2022). 

Governments worldwide are now spending vast sums of money on economic recovery to counter the impact of COVID-19, which will significantly influence our ability to deliver a green, resilient recovery. COVID-19 and complex disasters have highlighted the need for more investment in ex-ante resilience and the economic stimulus packages are an opportunity to address multiple risks, including climate change impacts. 

Forecast-based financing (FbF), and anticipatory actions and financing are early-action approaches which are gaining more and more attention and traction with the humanitarian agencies, donors, and disaster risk respondents as mechanisms for providing critical support to endangered communities and for ensuring faster and more sustainable recovery. Anticipatory financing is a mechanism that allows the release of pre-planned funds in the event of imminent disaster or a shock event, which significantly speeds up response and recovery efforts, running ahead of traditional financial aid provision and economic recovery, which require a lot more time and coordination (Weingärtner & Wilkinson, 2019).

 

Session guiding questions

  • How do anticipatory financing and FbF support recovery efforts?
  • How can we encourage adopting anticipatory financing policies and practices for recovery at the national level?
  • What incentives can governments provide to the private sector and other stakeholders to invest in anticipatory financing?
  • What are the main obstacles and opportunities in adopting such approaches and how can those be overcome?
  • What are some good examples of applied anticipatory financing?

 

Event bucket
Preparatory Days